A CRM implementation partner should show how it handles data, handoffs and change control, not only polished screenshots. Ask for evidence that predicts whether the system will work after launch.
The decision sequence
Begin with a real buyer or team task and keep the relevant source record. The worksheet below is meant to expose a decision that someone can check, rather than replace specialist review or claim a Megvi client result.
| Decision point | What to check |
|---|---|
| Request the method | Ask for a sample discovery output, data map, acceptance criteria and release checklist with client information removed. |
| Inspect integration thinking | Have the partner explain duplicate handling, failures, retries, consent fields and ownership across systems. |
| Check handover | Ask what documentation, training, access controls and support period are included. |
| Compare proposals | Score the same use case against scope, test evidence, ongoing ownership and price assumptions. |
Worked example
Illustrative comparison: Partner A quotes a fixed dashboard but excludes data cleanup and user acceptance testing. Partner B costs more but includes a field map, test cases and two weeks of monitored handover. A fair decision makes those exclusions visible before comparing totals.
What could change the decision
A logo wall or testimonial does not prove experience with your exact workflow. Request permissioned examples and speak to a relevant reference where possible.
Review before using it
Give each bidder the same sample lead journey and ask what could fail. Can they show how the failure would be detected and corrected?
Next useful step
A partner should be able to explain the core record relationships in How to Map Contacts, Companies and Deals in a CRM. For help with a live implementation, see Megvi’s CRM development service. Bring the current page, workflow or evidence record and the decision you need to make.